THE PART LEGACY OF TEN UP'S FAMOUS DAY.

c 1973 CBS TV

Jim Dreaper saddled Mullaghmurphy Blue to win at Musselburgh yesterday. A  famous name chugging along mostly unnoticed nowadays. Still, for many memories are evoked of him in his pomp and one eventful Cheltenham in particular when events played their part in influencing how the meeting would shape up in the future. 

On Tuesday March 11th 1975, the first day of the Cheltenham Festival was abandoned due to water logging. Telly Savalas was at the top of the charts, singing that dreary  ' If a picture paints a thousand words...', and the pictures from that day raised doubts as to whether the remainder of the meeting would be able to be staged at all.

Remember, this was an era when nature itself would dish out advantages as opposed to turf engineering.Connections of the good sloggers would be granted a reasonable expectation of having their favoured ground conditions come Cheltenham time.

The Wednesday went ahead with Comedy Of Errors convincingly regaining his Champion Hurdle crown from Lanzarote, who had taken it off him the previous year. Run in extremely testing ground, the race returned a time over 22 seconds slower than standard.

Dreaper trained two winners on the card, Lough Inagh who won the Champion Chase, saved from the previous day, and Brown Lad in the Lloyds Bank Hurdle. Brown Lad would end up being one of the most popular chasers of the decade.

Into the final day and conditions took a turn for the worse.Dark foreboding skies, persistent rain, waterlogged patches near some fences that led to two obstacles being omitted on the chase course.

The first three races were run in 59, 64 and 57 seconds slower than standard respectively. The last of those, the Sun Alliance Novice's Hurdle, was won by Davy Lad who would be successful in a dramatic Cheltenham Gold Cup two years later. Aldaniti finished fourth, and a future King George winner Bachelor's Hall came in eighth.

Next up was the Triumph Hurdle, with the winner Royal Epic returning a more respectable time, though God only knows what the true distance of the race actually was. A future legend in Night Nurse finished in the mid division. His ability to handle tiring conditions would be put straight two years later.

But this ground was a good deal severer than your average testing conditions. As they lined up for the Cheltenham Gold Cup, it was bordering on unraceable. Two former champions, The Dikler, and the warm favourite Captain Christy, were beaten relatively early on, with both eventually being pulled up.

It was Dreaper who made the winner's enclosure again with the hardy Ten Up. Racing in the Arkle colours, he dealt with the elements best of all to beat the ex American trained Soothsayer, with the mighty Bula back in third. Bula had been bidding to become what would of been at the time the first horse to win a Champion Hurdle and Cheltenham Gold Cup.

The race was run in 70 seconds slower than standard. After the race,the remaining three races were abandoned, the course deemed unfit for racing.

Fast forward to the typical Cheltenham Festival we have today. The over efficient drainage system can, and will in most circumstances, ensure that ground described as 'heavy' ten days before the beginning of the meeting, will be 'good to soft' when the first race is run.

Bob's Worth and Coneygree  share the distinction of being triumphant in the two Cheltenham Gold Cup's run on soft ground in the past twenty years. Or, to put in another way,  the only two renewals in the last two decades were the sloggers are given some hope.

Bob's Worth was more than a slogger and won despite the ground. Coneygree on the other hand would most likely not have won if the race had been on better ground. But who is to deny him his ground any more than the Spring ground performers for whom the cards are now massively stacked in their favour.

In the Ten Up times, you did of course have festivals run on good ground. A year later in 1976 for example. But during this most recent twenty year period , not a single Cheltenham Gold Cup was staged on heavy going. The message is to those connected to quality animals whose sin is to be able to produce their true optimum on heavy, is that they can go and whistle.

In contrast those with Spring ground horses can be confident of having the playing field laid out to suit them at both Cheltenham and Aintree. Not always, but most of the time.

It's rare for the elements to impose themselves at both meetings in the same year. Cheltenham 1980, another mudbath, Chinrullah and Tied Cottage. Then a couple of weeks after, Ben Nevis winning the Grand National in heavy ground.

Of the abandoned racedays at the festival since, the snowfall that caused the 1978 Gold Cup to be lost on the day and staged the following month could not gave been saved by any workable man made invention. Similar with the high winds that caused a day to be abandoned in 2008. And the dreaded  foot and mouth episode at the turn of the millennium, more to do with government than racing.

Yes, it's commercialism with the fear of losing all the course and bookmaking revenue and endangering future sponsorship if the meeting was lost, but the tide has surely turned too far now and it is an issue that should be revisited.

Bristol De Mai was twenty lengths away in last season's Gold Cup. If the race had been run on heavy he'd have been much closer. Enough to have made him a possible winner ? We are never going to get the chance to find out. A mid-winter mud lover is what he'll probably be remembered as unless the God's assist.

And we all have our favourites who we think, yes, he would have gone close in some of the old Gold Cup's. Keen Leader, a big giant dope with that something about him that can still make the sport special. It could have been different but it would have required truly testing conditions and a try with another trainer, particularly Martin Pipe.The shape of the course may still not have been ideal but he would have been damn interesting in such a set of scenarios.

Now we just appreciate some excellent performances in the mud, weekend after weekend. Particularly in Ireland. But we do so knowing that the face value of the form might not be worth a carrot come Cheltenham time.

BEING JUDGED AGAINST YOUR PEERS

It was clear there was no intention to be condescending, but that was how it sounded when Willie Mullins first post race comment after the Hennessy was to thank Sandra Hughes for the great shape Total Recall was in when he arrived at his new home.

Because of Mullins stature at the top of the training tree, he would not benefit from boasting, however furtively he may have chosen to.The notion that trainers are as good as the ammunition they are given is nonsense.No more than group huddle trainer speak.

When a small operations come away from a horses in training sale with a cast off  bought cheaply from one of the showcase yards, then rejuvenates their new charge, the narrative they bring out is the same one always.That one about treating the horse as an individual and all that stuff.

Early in 2004,Paul Nicholls took in Venn Ottery from the late Oliver Carter, who also owned the gelding. After a maiden chase win at Leicester, he won three off his next four starts all in handicaps, beginning off a lowly 87. At the end of the run his official rating was 117.

Pitted in the deep end in the Queen Mother Champion Chase, he started at 33/1 but the visual image of the race he ran sits in the memory as clearly as the winning performance of his stable companion Azertyuiop. Timmy Murphy arrived on the scene swinging away, and even allowing for the rider's often deceptive pose, the pair were in with a real shout of winning until finding nothing from the second last onwards.

Funnily enough, despite being portrayed as a bit of a fruitcake ,Carter  had been a champion point to point trainer and had also trained Otter Way to win the Whitbread Gold Cup back in the 1970's.Venn  Ottery had six changes of trainer after leaving Nicholls and never won again.

Of all the routine cases of horses being reconditioned after joining Martin Pipe, one of the most notable was in the shape of Shooting Light,who Pipe took over from Pat Murphy in 2001.

Formerly placed in the Triumph Hurdle, Shooting Light had turned into a useful novice chaser in his first season over fences, but nothing more. He did not on the face of it look to have any real improvement left in him.There were plenty of  miles on the clock after beginning his career on the flat with Michael Jarvis.

On his first run since his move to Pond House the impression he made was astounding. You will go a long way to see more strikingly impressive winner of a steeplechase.The race, a thirteen runner handicap at the Cheltenham October meeting was competitive enough.The winning distance was eleven lengths but he was value for any number you wished.

He followed up in the Thomas Pink at the same venue, then the Tote Silver Cup at Ascot. When he next appeared, when pulling up in Best Mate's King George, his official rating was 162, an incredible  39 lb higher than when beginning the winning sequence which began just two months earlier

In more recent times we have had the emergence of  David O'Meara who is curiously in danger of become a passing fad. Only two years ago many thought he had a magic wand, pondered how far he could go, and some were spouting rumours that he could even be the next boss of Ballydoyle.

At the centre of this furor was the improvement he managed to conjure from Amazing Maria. On the animal's final outing for his previous trainer Ed Dunlop, in September 2014, she started at 25/1 and beat one home in the Group 3 Sceptre Stakes at Doncaster. Her official rating was 101.

When she next appeared in May 2015, the now five year old had been moved by owner Robert Ogden  to  O'Meara's Yorkshire set up. Finishing third in a valuable Ascot handicap she followed up by filling the same position in a Group 2 at the Curragh. Then, unexpectedly, the level of her form spiraled upwards.

Victorious at the Royal meeting in the Group 2 Duke of Cambridge when starting 25/1, she then followed up at the highest level twice, firstly in the Falmouth Stakes at Newmarket, then the Prix Rothschild over in Deauville.

The actual measured improvement was little more than a stone, but the achievement in turning what seemed to be a animal limited by her ability in Group races into a rattling high class horse was noticed.

This consolidated the belief that O'Meara possessed a rare skill to yield results that far exceeded the norm. The previous season he had trained Move In Time to win the Prix de l' Abbaye, a horse who first ran for the yard 18 months earlier off a mark of 85 after arriving seemingly exposed from Bryan Smart's stable.

The previous month O'Meara had taken another top level sprint with G-Force in the Haydock Sprint Cup. G-Force had a contrasting profile. O'Meara took charge after his first run as a juvenile the previous season, nurturing him slowly up the ladder.

Since Amazing Maria's Prix Rothschild, O'Meara has not trained a winner at the highest level in Europe.While there has been three in North America it is still not what was predicted.

Being assessed against your peers can on rare occasions produce some misleading impressions. In the early 1980's the Dickinsons took in The Mighty Mac and Planetman from the yard of John Edwards.

The horses showed immediate improvement, looking different beasts , with a swagger about them, and a change in running styles too. This leaving a cloud over the training ability of Edwards.

Within a few years Edwards was showing himself a fine trainer with his handling of the magnificent Pearlyman, who won two Queen Mother Champion Chases. He also went painfully close to having a Cheltenham Gold Cup winner through Yahoo.

Returning to O'Meara; since 2016 he has operated from purposely built facilities in Upper Helmsley. While his turnover in winners and total prize money continue on the same sort of level, the many who anticipated him being the next big name to breakthrough have observed what touches on a scattergun style modus operandi. 

The truly big owners have not come in force and it could be that he is shackled with being pigeonholed as a trainer who exceeds with cast offs from others.This may or may not be overcome. John Thaw once bemoaned that when he was going about his private life in public places, people would point and say,' look, it's Reagan'.There is still hope but it's just as much in the hands of others as himself.  

image source - www.museum.tv / Archives

SHAPING MINDS

Behind the  regular faces and voices that broadcast  horse racing, there are clearly persons unknown pulling the strings, tidying up racing history, and influencing the direction the sport is taking.

Who knows how many of these individuals exist, whether they have a leader who has a final say, or whether they exercise committee style democracy while secretly and slyly trying to influence others.

What cannot be doubted is that they do very much exist and are part of a disturbing trend where the modern media crafts propaganda, as they the spinners believe they know best and what is best for others.

The most disturbing example of this during the past weekend in the racing sphere happened during that innocent looking piece on ITV racing,where they showed Tony McCoy and John Francome playing golf, buddying and talking racing.

During their chit chat, Francome claimed that he would have been just as successful a rider without carrying the whip. McCoy agreed that he too would have enjoyed the same level of success whipless.

Now what on earth has happened to the ' keep your nose out of what you know nowt about '  retort, that would be the normal response from most riders when non horseman made suggestions about whips and the like.

Indeed, when John McCririck used to harp on about banning the whip, whether sincere or just for the purpose of building a niche for himself, he'd be told that he had no knowledge of the area he was trying to reshape, that such subjects were for experienced horseman to debate.

Now, we are led to believe that someone like McCoy is all easy go about not needing a whip, and as far as someone new watching the sport is concerned, probably always felt this way.

There is something very sinister lurking beneath here. And I would not be surprised if there are plans behind the scenes to remove the whip from the sport.

Anyone with a modicum of common sense will realise that an air cushioned whip can cause scant harm to a eighty stone animal high on adrenaline. It is all to do with image.This is why for many years now, twenty four in fact, jockeys are penalised if they raise their whips above shoulder height.

Some very dimwitted persons truly believe that there are a potential multitude of young people who are pondering over whether to become racing fans and who will be put off by the sight of whips being raised in true Eddery and Piggott style.

If there is indeed secret directives issued for racing people to act our of character and be something different to what they really are to re brand the sport, the ridiculous thing about it all is the notion that there exists a would be fresh faced generation watching the sport and becoming fans.

Even Richard Hoiles, from the commentary box, familiarised 'those who may be watching for the first time', with the layout of Newbury. He is wishing.

Let's consider the three TV channel days of the 1970's  - in fact it was not until 1984 that Channel 4 came on the air. Compared to other sports, the live coverage of racing fared well in those times,

Remember, apart from the British Grand Prix you would have to tune into Radio 2 at 7pm on Sunday to find out the result of the Grand Prix. For pictures of the race you would have to buy a copy of Motorsport for your fix of Fittipaldi,Stewart, Sheckter, Lauda, Peterson and Reutemann.

If you wanted to find out how Real Madrid,Bayern Munich or Juventus fared, then you would have to buy a football magazine the following week. The US PGA Golf Tour, well we were oblivious to it. Same with the Tennis tour

What about the England Cricket team on tour. Radio 2 again, but at least there was commentary to help us form the pictures in our minds. The  cricket coverage now, both Sky and BT, is second to no other sport. Those of us staying up through the night cannot have failed to have been impressed by the BT team, particularly how Boycott and Gilchrist pair well together. And there is even a rare bookmaking advert shown at every interval which you never tire of, the one about how 'kwiffing' the Ashes price feels like when that teacher asks you to squash bubbles on bubble wrap

At least with racing, if you were sat at home with the TV switched on with nothing in particular to watch, there would back then be a one in three chance that you would be exposed to it.

Contrast with the present. All sports covered from head to toe, a thousand TV channels readily available, and even further competition from Play Stations, You Tube, i-Players and the like. The chances of newbies tuning into to watch a sport which they feel indifferent to whether it exists or not, are minimal.

On last Friday's ITV racing coverage, the 2017 LBO Manager Of The Year, Ron Hearn, was allowed, unchallenged, to express a forthright opinion about FOBT's , proclaiming that the victims would be betting office staff losing their jobs if the maximum stake per spin was severely reduced

Ed Chamberlin did at least, in defence of the upcoming change, say, ' something had to be done' but failed to elaborate, whether on his own accord or responding to a voice in his ear. Fitzgerald and Harvey chose not to get involved.

Hearn revealed that 60% of the business in his shop is on the FOBT's. Racing people often brush this aside by pointing out the trend to bet via smartphones, while forgetting that this applies to betting on the other sports and forms of betting, including casino games.

If you could see a breakdown of age groups and the sports they bet on, the prognosis for racing would be very grim indeed. The graph would take a steep dive as the age group reduced. And anyone hoping that the present punters aged thirty five and under who would have first suckled on football will turn to horse racing as they mature have no basis for such optimism.

image licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

THROUGH THE EYES OF THE MODERN 'RACEGOER'

Papering over the cracks is an exercise that those in denial over the true decline of horse racing are very efficient at undertaking.The emphasis is all on audience, whether it be the inebriated, sometimes unruly sorts who fill the coffers at the 'cult ' courses, or this imaginary mass of fresh born interest watching on terrestrial television.

Those of us who work daily among large floors of colleagues will know how inappreciable the sport truly has become. Reality chips away bit by bit until we suddenly stand back and think , 'Christ, this really ain't that popular anymore'.

A couple of years back I was chatting with a regular, everyday punter.Years ago, he would have visited the LBO everyday.This has now evolved to a mixture of online activity, with live visits mixed in to take advantage of concessions.

It was York Ebor week. 'What have you backed ?', I inquired. The answer was not the one I'd been expecting for he proceeded to give out details of his bets on lower league football. Sighing, I pointed out that I meant the horses. ' I know you did,' he replied, before agreeing that years back he would have been looking forward to the racing, ' But it's different now', he added,'there is more choice.'

This fiftysomething man was brought up with the customary betting link to horses, supported by greyhounds, along with the novelty of the long list on the fixed odds.The common and normal sight was the father of the household involving himself with racing and betting. He may have gone the football most weeks, but the betting was almost all on horses.

This is where the link is now broken. Anyone under thirty is now more likely to have been brought up in a household where betting is linked predominantly to football.This was a development that started to take hold in the mid 1990's.

And we can be even more certain that these under thirties, many of whom will already have young families themselves, will clearly put to bed once and for all the notion that a customary link still exists whereby betting is mainly all about horses.

In fact the person in question will often speak of his own adult son, revealing that he religiously backs Jason Day blindly, and has done for years.He'll recount his son's football bets from the weekend. His son does not bet on horses. He himself talks more of Jamie Lovemark than Jamie Spencer.

Trying to introduce someone to the sport can be pretty futile too.I took a drinking buddy to the races for the first time about ten years ago. I'll call him Gaz. To try and sell the sport to him I had to put a an angle of added interest on, as Gaz had not the slightest inclination to pick up knowledge about the sport.

So I took him out of his comfort zone of the bars and around the paddock. I began pointing out known racing people with comments such as, ' he's a crook', 'she's there because of a rich father ',
'he's a bit of a pysco', ' he's slept with that ones wife'.

It was hard work and not in the BHA  manual of how to introduce new people to the sport. And I soon discovered that my efforts were futile.

In one of the races, Gaz had backed a chaser who was held in second place approaching the last.
Clearly not familiar with expected racecourse protocol, he suddenly yelled,' Break a leg you bastard!'  leaving me gobsmacked and embarrassed.

Believe it or not this is an intelligent  person who at the time was working in the Probation Service with responsible roles, including articulating reports to magistrates. He is in a fairly well paid position now in another branch of the Civil Service.

This lack of respect, feel, care and understanding for the sport is not the remit of reprobates, but sadly also the norm across the respectable part of society as a whole.

Gaz does however does form a gang of three or four drinking buddies who have the Thursday of Aintree in our calendars every year. Between visits all of his bets are on football or rugby, and as far as I know he has no plans to take his son to the races, and does not watch racing when at home. The fact that he continues to go each year may in the BHA's eyes class him as being 'won over' by the sport.That could not be further from the truth.

Back in 2014, he was unable to attend so our party consisted of a gang of three. Chris has no interest in the racing, but will attend once a year. He likewise will not have a bet on the horses in between his annual visits. His yearly punting is on the odd combination of football, Grand Prix racing, boxing, and poker. He latched on to Leicester City relatively early in the season when they won the Premiership, backing them at 66/1, eventually laying off.

Phil is a dyed in the wool, long term racing fan. He sketches horses in his spare time, always has his camera with him at the racecourse, asks for the odd autograph, and will often take his wife and two primary school sons racing. He would make a good role model for the sport but unfortunately he is very much the exception to the rule. Besides, that he has no inclination to drink himself into a stupor would perhaps not please racecourse management at some of our venues.

On this particular day there were some curious conversations.Chris was offering post race summaries consisting of comments like ' my horse was winning but they still had to go around one more time ', while Phil would be discussing the progressive position in the pecking order of Craig Nichol in the Nicky Richards stable.

Perhaps, the best effort you could make to appreciate just how insignificant the racing per se is at the cult venues, is to go on an outing with a large work party

I did just this on a visit to one of these new trashy York fixtures on the day Bayern Munich beat Borussia Dortmund in the Champions League Final.

One of our party had a connection to a pub so conveniently organised for the premises to be privately open at 9 am for us to enjoy a hearty breakfast. Then straight into a minibus and off to York, the cans of beer already being cracked open.

Stopping for a short break at Hartshead Moor service station, one of our party was already vomiting in the car park. Arriving at the course after missing the first race, the whole party positioned themselves for the rest of the day inside the bar, making no effort to watch a race live.Some of these 'racegoers' did not even bother having a bet.

 A pure drinking fest.The evening in the center of York was enjoyable, the racecourse experience not. We later heard that a young  racegoer who had been sliding down the banisters in high jinks had fallen right down the stairwell to the ground floor.He never survived.

Indeed, racecourses have always had their share of drunks showing just a smidgen of care for the actual sport. But there can never have been a time when such a high percentage have no interest in it whatsoever, and who will not even cast an eye over a racecard between visits to the course.

This is the beginning of the tremor taking hold. It has come from the masses being weaned off betting on horses and will truly set in when the last real generation of racing fans disappear.

BRING SOME 'SOUL' BACK TO THE SPORT

The name of Royal Gaye will not mean much to racing fans who have not yet reached the wrong side of fifty. Trained by Fred Rimmell in the 1970's, the gelding was not even a top class performer in his own right, but will go down in history as the winner of what undoubtedly remains the most strongly contested handicap hurdle ever staged.

The way the racing program is now moldered with those in the top band having races 'made to fit', means that the quality of the field assembled for the race Royal Gaye won will never be repeated in a handicap. 

It was May Day 1978 when Haydock Park staged the first running of the Royal Doulton Handicap Hurdle. With a big pot on offer, not having today's wealthier version of the Punchestown Festival to contend with, and in an era without molly coddling conditions races littering the calendar, the event promised to attract some big names.

But the promoters could still not have possibly been expecting the response they received. It would be no exaggeration to describe it as fantasy board game stuff.

Night Nurse, still to this day the highest rated hurdler of all time by Timeform, had just lost his crown to his established adversary Monksfield, who remains the joint second highest ever hurdler on Timeform ratings. Both lined up.So too did the highly popular Sea Pigeon, who would go on and win the 1980 and 1981 running's of the Champion Hurdle, as well as an Ebor to add to his Chester Cups, just for good measure.

The three superstars were joined by the Bob Turnell pair Beacon Light, who had finished third in the Champion Hurdle, and the enigmatic Bird's Nest, the old foe of Night Nurse and widely acknowledged to this day as one of the best hurdlers never to win a Champion Hurdle.

It is outrageous to consider that something was actually missing from the field. For we had just lost the enigma and legend called Golden Cygnet, who for regretfully too short a time blazed across the hurdling scene then left us forever after being fatally injured. His loss was substantial, even in such a vintage era.

Monksfield with Dessie Hughes aboard, and Sea Pigeon, partnered by Jonjo O'Neil both carried 12 stone. Night Nurse, carried 11st 9 lb, Bird's Nest 11st 8 lb, and his stable companion Beacon Light had 11st 6 lb. Further down the field you had Schweppes Hurdle and Imperial Cup winners and the like, receiving shovels of weight. Amazingly,half the twenty runner field carried the minimum 10 stone.

Monksfield was the moral winner, failing by only three quarters of a length to concede a full two stone to the Colin Tinkler ridden winner,who himself had won at Aintree on his previous outing. Close behind was Night Nurse, who rallied gamely to finish just over two lengths further back in third.

Monksfield was arguably the toughest Champion Hurdler ever to look through a bridle. Prior to Cheltenham, he would be campaigned in his homeland, handicap after handicap, shouldering big weights in testing ground. Writing about Monksfield during that season, the Timeform organisation noted, with understatement, that ' his has been a strenuous career '.

In fact nowadays it would be termed a grueling career but, he thrived, incredibly remained an entire, and found a small stallion role when he retired.

He would do it all again the following season, retaining his Champion Hurdle then, after his customary visit to Aintree, returning for the second running of the Royal Doulton where this time, burdening 12st again, he found Beacon Light too good to whom he was conceding 13 lb.

In Ireland there existed no program of regular condition races that the likes of Istabraq and Hurricane Fly would later take in. Small fields, the odd scare, a rare defeat or tussle, but never that buzz when you watch a star tested in the big field handicap scenario, giving away lumps of weight. Neither of these ever ran in a handicap hurdle.There was never any need to.

If someone asked what 'soul' was in racing, then an acceptable answer could well be circumstances when horses are tested in a variety of conditions and who will try their hand giving weight away from the top of the handicap instead of being lovingly campaigned in a program of small field conditions events.

The UK did offer a conditions race program for top flight hurdlers at the time. You could start in the Fighting Fifth, then the Champion Hurdle Trial at Cheltenham, go for either the Christmas Hurdle at Kempton or New Years Day Hurdle at Windsor, then the Oteley at Sandown.

Some did, but some mixed handicaps in too. For example, Sea Pigeon carried top weight to win the Embassy Hurdle at Haydock one year, then attempted the same feat when finding Decent Fellow too good in the same race on a later occasion. This year he gave that event a miss as his season began with a fall on his only ever attempt over fences, in the Colonial Cup, at Camden,South Carolina. That's an event we never hear much of nowadays.

Top class established hurdlers do not appear in handicaps anymore. You'll get a Celtic Shot , Make A Stand or Rooster Booster going through the handicap route on the way up, but once they are established top class horses, connections would never use a handicap as a target in itself or as a warm up for the big one.

It will sometimes happen in the chasing sphere, Arkle, the benchmark for all, was of course was tested in handicaps, mostly when the only one in the handicap proper. Two decades later  Burrough Hill Lad was considered an outstanding Cheltenham Gold Cup winner only because of his weight carrying performance in the Hennessy. And not to forget that one of  the best and most popular chasers ever, Desert Orchid ,also could be said to have had a 'strenuous career' with regular weight defying performances in handicaps over all sorts of distances.

And if this smacks of ignorant rose tinted spectacle stuff, then what about Denman's two winning Hennessy performances, both under under 11st 12lb. They were exhilarating and testament to what the sport is regularly missing out on nowadays.

It would not be wide off the mark to suggest that when Denman won the second of those, in 2009, it was the finest example in the past decade of the sport at its very best. A few minuites that can mesmerize and win over new fans.

Such moments are becoming rarer. National Hunt racing could do with a sponsor with some initiative, ploughing a bundle into the Schweppes, or Befair Hurdle,whatever its called now, so those at the top of the tree will participate and give at least one cuddly conditions race a miss.

The Grand National has become a public relations exercise and the heady money on offer is not consistently pulling in the very best when they are at their zenith. So why not give the Hennessy such a monetary boost that the previous season's Cheltenham Gold Cup winner will take it in as part of his schedule. The Betfair Chase would have to suffer, but the sacrifice would be worth it.

SMOKE AND MIRRORS

The reason we don't answer calls to numbers we don't recognise or fail to answer the doors to curious strangers with clipboards is because we have no wish to engage with some unctuous, guileful character with a forced smile. When trying to picture and hear such a being, Corals mouthpiece Simon Clare could be used as a basis for a caricature.

Some months back a thread was started on the Betfair Forum inviting the posters to name the person they most disliked in racing. The name of Simon Clare littered the responses,though the general gist  was that all of the bookmakers reps are cut of the same cloth and disliked across the board by those with no vested interest in what they stand for.

If  the internet had existed in the 1970's and racing fans had then been asked the same question, it would be inconceivable that someone in the same role would get anywhere near the top of the list. Yarn spinners like  Ron Pollard of Ladbrokes ,and William Hill's Graham Sharpe were indeed 'personalities', but were colourful characters and not despised.

So when a post appeared on the Betfair Forum last Monday evening from a long standing poster by the name of Irish Whisper, announcing that he would be appearing on the televised ATR Sunday Forum with Clare and Paul Kealy of the Racing Post, and whether there were any questions forum members would like him to put to Clare, the response was predictably hot.

Irish Whisper is Kevin Blake. He has various journalistic roles in the industry, states he is a successful punter, and revealed that he also works as an advisor to Joseph O'Brien in the placing of his horses. He does not post on the Betfair Forum as frequently as he once did but appears to have retained his principles.

The ATR Sunday Forum rarely offers much to listen to. Most of us don't bother tuning in, too accustomed to the likes of combinations of John McCririck, Chris Cook, Peter Thomas and Gaye Kellaway going through the motions without rocking any boats.

This time we would be watching, without really knowing what to expect.

It got off to an underwhelming start with the announcement from presenter Sean Boyce that Paul Kealy was under the weather and would be leaving his seat empty. Moreover, the introductions by Boyce took far to long,wasting valuable time, though we did hear that Clare was from a middle class London family and the son of a head shrink.

Even before any awkward questions arose Clare looked visibly uneasy, lots of jestering with his arms, and already defensive in tone. And it was not as though he was in the pressure cooker straight away. There was no flow, issues began to be touched upon but it was not until over half an hour into the programme before Boyce read out a viewers question, apparently from a mysterious, well known journalist, who was getting knocked back with twenty quid bets.

Clare defended the practice by saying that it was wrong to look at the issue in the light of a single twenty quid bet being knocked back, rather we should consider that it could be a thousand punters all wanting individual bets at the top line price.

One very pertinent point raised by Blake here related to the wisdom in bookmakers closing down accounts early on, due to the patterns displayed by the punter predicted as unlikely to be profitable to the bookmaker in the long term.

He brought up the common scenario whereby punters can get in the mode of carefully finding some value wise shrewd bets, giving the impression of being in full control.That is until they hit a bad spell when the willpower quickly dissolves and the rule book goes out the window, and with it an inability to batten down the hatches.

The option of being patient and chipping away in a controlled manner until the tide turns seems less appealing than trying smash out of trouble which often ends up exhausting the whole betting bank and rendering fruitless all the good work previously achieved.

Ninety five per cent of us have all done this.

It can of course become worse for those who succumb to what is presently the most addictive and obtuse habit in gambling, the cancerous FOBTS, which as expected were attacked by Blake and defended by Clare.

These horrible, gaudy looking and gaudy sounding machines bring a new breed of desperadoes into LBO's. To observers the players appear under a spell. These machines offer no pauses to reflect and re-asses finances.

On the day Frankel won the Juddmonte, I left before the final race to catch a train. On the way to the station I popped into an LBO to watch the last race. There existed  two separate communities, a small group of punters, ready for the last event to get under away.A dying breed but visible enough on big race days.

Then there there was the other 'community', though these were made up of individuals who did not interact with one another. Seated, playing the FOBTS, press,press,press, oblivious to all else. I doubt they would have swiveled around for the few minuites it took to run Frankel's race.

The show's schedule was one and a quarter hours, but with it being slow to warm up and with the breaks, it soon approached the late stages and had not even got into full stride. It was regretful that Kiely had not shown, as Blake came out with a couple of late hooks.

He asked why it is left to journalists from outside the sport to report on issues in areas that the racing journalists themselves won't delve into, then suggested it's down to racing writers and broadcasters carrying out paid work for bookmakers, and not wishing to bite the hand that feeds.

In working for ATR Blake himself could be said in a roundabout way to be in paid employment by bookmakers, but his late rally left the viewer in no doubt what he was not frightened to ruffle some important feathers.

Putting him on a similar show alongside Bruce Millington ,Graham Cunningham, with Paul Haigh added to even numbers up, would be pay per view material. We could safely name the two who be most likely to pull sickies at the last moment.

A FREE VOICE FOR ALL

Until the birth of social media no platform was available for racing fans to freely express their views and put the racing world to right.Well, you did have readers letters pages in some racing publications, but nothing that would rock the boat could be uttered. 

Much respected trainer .... no jockey riding better.... charming owner and a benefit to the sport.That's all they wanted to print from you. Most of the time at least. It meant the voiceless thousands could be kept silent.Criticism was only accepted in a gentle way.

This meant a few 'yes people' with their fingers deep in the heavily agendasised pie had freedom of the stage and the microphones to themselves. The nearest the rest of us got to a public platform was airing views in a racecourse bar, or betting office.Nothing that could possibly rile Brough Scott and his like.

The arrival of internet forums changed all that.The gags came off and you were able to express views  that would make many uncomfortable. All of a sudden those who were use to their crowns being polished,often undeservedly, had to now learn to grow a skin.

Those who claimed never to read the Betfair Forum were clearly monitoring it. Never having had to contend with such riff raff before, they would be quick to take exception to any statement concerning themselves which they did not find agreeable.

Posters received suspensions or even lifetime bans for voicing opinions that did not even border on being libelous. As an example, a frequent but intelligent and coherent poster on the Betfair Forum, received a life ban for airing the view that a particular racecourse commentator was rubbish. It was nothing more or nothing less than this.

Another thin skinned writer and television journalist, himself a forum member, would lose it on the keyboards and has even invited posters to meet him for a physical fight.

Some challenged characters in the racing media are so precious that their names are starred out when you attempt to type them.There are rumours that lawyers scan the forum for potentially libelous comments. What is strange is that a post can be pulled for a comment that says very little about some jockeys, while others are accused of strangling a mount or purposely finding trouble in running, and the comments stand unchallenged.

Racing Post editor Bruce Millington once wrote that Betfair Forum members were not fit to be let loose with a set of crayons. He also suggested that some mental home residents must be getting access to computers.

While it was easy to conjure up a freaky image in the mind's eye of Gremlin like characters on keyboards up and down the country, cackling away and making mischief, there were and still are some excellently stated threads criticising how the Racing Post has fallen from grace, and that the publication exists to serve the bookmaking industry.

Some of these threads disappear. So do most that mention Millington's name.This is a court were career journalists are too scared to tread.

The most celebrated thread on the Forum was the one titled 'Clerkwatch', which began in April 2008. This was set up to build evidence that the going descriptions issued by clerks of the courses were on the scale of inaccurate to downright false.

There was an underlying allegation that confusing the playing arena for the punter would lead to more unpredictable results, increased profits for the bookmakers, which in turn would benefit racing through the Gross Profits Tax structure, used to determine the levy collected.

It was an open thread based on the trust that if you contributed, then you knew what you were talking about. Each day race times were studied against the standard times, then discussed in the context of the going descriptions and stick readings.

Patterns emerged where some racecourse clerks grew reputations for taking more liberties with going descriptions than others.The problem was with it being a free for all it would only take one or two to undermine the whole thread.

An owner who has had some decent animals with both Roger Charlton, and the Hannons, contributed to the thread making some interesting observations. He eventually left due to the views of one or two headstrong individuals who would not consider valid and well constructed views that challenged their own.

Furthermore, a popular racecourse commentator who is a member of the forum was dismayed when a poster accused Ascot of selective watering during the middle of the Royal meeting one year, in order to switch the bias of the draw and confuse the punting public.

The thread reached its high point when its two main engineers, Londoner Nick Davies who posted as 'Zilzal' , and a person from the Middlesbrough area who posted as 'Jonjo', were invited to a preliminary meeting with some clerks of courses organised by the BHA. They were led to believe that the meeting would be a precursor to a larger gathering, with the possibility of television cameras being present.

Nothing from the meeting was taken any further.They never heard from the BHA again.Not long after the thread went silent, hope abandoned.

The thread received recognition from Guardian journalist Greg Wood.The rest of the scribes, too snug and settled to risk biting the hands that feed, did not wish to turn any of their mutually beneficial friendships sour. Besides, they could  not contemplate giving recognition to a forum that may have fired arrows at them in the past.

When assessing the Betfair Forum in general, it has to be said that the number of intelligent and enthusiastic posters has declined in recent years.There are a handful of good ones but many have disappeared.

The other popular forum  is 'The Racing Forum' . Posters are generally more respectful to one another than the Betfair Forum, the pace is more sedate, but worryingly there are a few regulars who seem to work for major bookmaking firms,thus may have an agenda. Put it this way, a certain bookmaking firm appears to have more influence on the forum than Betfair do on theirs.

Hopefully there will be a resurgence in the Betfair Forum, an increased intensity ( without the introductions of tools if possible) on The Racing Forum, or even the birth of a new forum..

That we can only hope could be less of a sign that many genuine, articulate members were fed up with the idiots aboard the ship and more to do with the fact that interest in the sport of horse racing overall is declining. And that is a suspicion that should make every racing enthusiast uneasy.

Picture licensed by Creative Commons